Simon Fischer-Baum
3rd Year Graduate student
Department of Cognitive Science
office - Krieger
239 office hours – tba office telephone - (410) 516-7625
Research
Interests
I am interested in studying the representations and processes the human
mind/brain uses to produce and comprehend language. Individuals whose cognitive
system have been damaged after brain-damage provide a unique opportunity to
answer some of these questions as (1) specific cognitive processes might be
damaged, while others remain intact or (2) errors made by these subjects might
reveal underlying structure. I am also interested in understanding the causes
of the cognitive deficits observed in these brain-damaged individuals and
computational modeling of the intact and damaged system.
Representations
of Letter order in Orthographic Representations:
Our knowledge of the spelling of a word contains information about both
letter identities and letter order. How is order information encoded? Brenda
Rapp, Michael McCloskey and I have been studying several brain-damaged
individuals who perseverate – incorrectly insert previously produced responses
– in spelling tasks. For example, after correctly spelling ROUGH, one
individual intruded a G into his spelling of CHANCE, instead producing CHANGE. These intruded letters appear in the same position
in the error as they appeared in the previous response more often than would be
expected by chance. Careful analysis allows us to determine the type of
position represented in the orthographic representations required for spelling.
Michael McCloskey and I have been studying similar errors made by
neurologically-intact subjects in an ordered list-recall to determine whether
representation of order information is shared between short-term memory tasks
and spelling. Paul Smolensky and I have been
investigating how priming data in the reading literature bears on theories of
how orthographic position is encoded in our orthographic input representations.
For example, do relative and transposition priming effects provide evidence for
context-dependent rather than context-independent representations or do they
constitute evidence for coarse-coded rather than fine-tuned position
representations?
Orthographic
Morphology:
Recent work has demonstrated that certain patients perform worse in
tasks that require morphological production when they are asked to produce the
written form than the spoken form, including some patients who perform at
normal levels in spoken production but catastrophically with written
production. We are studying one of these individuals to determine the types of
morphological forms – regular vs. irregular, inflectional vs. derivational –
that she is impaired on as well as the types of errors she is making on these
forms to understand morpheme representation and the morphological processes
that occur in the orthographic system.
The Underlying
Causes of Perseverations:
Many individuals perseverate after brain-damage. Several proposals have
been put forth for the underlying causes of these perseverations, which have
consequences for our understanding of the temporal dynamics of cognitive
processing. The perseveration deficit argues that representational units fail
to be normally suppressed after they have been produce, preventing the current
target units from being selected. The deafferentation
hypothesis states that perseverations occur when there is less information
flowing from the previous processing level to the production level, leaving the
normally activated previously produced item the most active of the set of
units. We are studying the perseveration errors made by a number of
brain-damaged individuals to understand what type(s) of deficit(s) leads to
perseverations.
Education
2005-present, Cognitive Science,
Advisor: Brenda Rapp
B.A. 2003, Neuroscience and Behavior (with Honors),
Advisor: Michele Miozzo
Teaching
Coursework
Conferences
Attended
Posters and
Presentations