Johns Hopkins UniversityHomewood Campus – (410-516-5250/office phone)

COGNITIVE SCIENCE DEPARTMENT

COLLOQUIUM

 

Thursday, November 20, 2003  -  3:30 p.m.

Room #134A Krieger Hall   -   (Refreshments served at 3:15 p.m.)

 

Dr. John Alderete

English Department
University of South Carolina

 

“Navigating the Overlap Between Phonology and Morphology: Perspectives from Optimality Theory”

 

The modular inclination of generative linguistics often requires a phonological module distinct from a morphological module. The phonology is responsible for sound inventories and phonological processes, i.e., systematic modifications of sound structure. Morphology, on the other hand, is the formal system of marking oppositions among words. Virtually every language, however, exhibits ?rocess-based morphology?(PBM), where systematic modifications of sound structure are used to mark morphological distinctions. For example, intensive adjectives are formed in Javanese by raising and tensing the vowel of the last syllable, e.g., /alUs/ > alus ? efined, smooth? phonological tensing (U>u) marks this morphological category.

 

Debates over the years have argued that PBM either involves essentially phonological processes that are indexed for a morphological environment (a common view in generative phonology), or that it is morphological in nature, involving morphology that goes beyond simple affixation (see especially Anderson 1992 and Zwicky 1988). One of the chief aims of this talk is to demonstrate that the inherent principles of Optimality Theory contribute to this debate by providing straightforward classifications of PBM as inherently morphological processes. An analysis of selected examples will be given employing Featural Affixation (after Akinlabi 1996 and Zoll 1996) and Anti-faithfulness (Alderete 2001), and it will be argued that these theories provide both the descriptive freedom necessary for analyzing PBM and a set of principles that limit PBM to a restricted typology of process types. Finally, in a more speculative vein, the problem of classifying and analyzing PBM will be studied from the view of the learner. It will be shown that the induction of Anti-faithfulness constraints in the ranking protocol prescribed by Biased Constraint Demotion (Prince and Tesar to appear) provides both a means of identifying the correct analysis of PBM, in addition to solving certain formal problems that may arise in the acquisition of morpho-phonemic alternations

 

Faculty Hosts:  Dr. Paul Smolensky (Smolensky@cogsci.jhu.edu)

Dr. Luigi Burzio (burzio@cogsci.jhu.edu)